Ai Weiwei: the multi-tasker

19Nov

Art, Politics and Media in one gesture

Detail of a still from the 91 minute documentary
“Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry” 2011 by Alison Klayman.
He is documenting for his blog in a Munich hospital after surgery for a brain hemorrhage during his ‘So Sorry’ show at Haus der Kunst. aiweiwei.blog.hausderkunst.de
 
The title of his exhibition,
‘So Sorry’ refers to the apologies expressed in the headlines of the news worldwide for a tragedy or wrong as if an apology meant it was too late
to make amends.
 
In this sense the title of the documentary could be read as meaning that Ai Weiwei is never sorry, never finished with seeking justice or freedom.

Detail of a photo from smarthistory.khanacademy.org of “Remembering” by Ai Weiwei was made out of 9000 children’s backpacks in five colours attached to the facade of the Munich, Haus der Kunst, between October 2009 and January 2010.


Still from the 2010 50 minute BBC documentary “Ai Weiwei, Without Fear or Favor”
on Youtube (06:50)
“She lived happily in this world for seven years”
was said by a mother of one of the victims of the 2008 earthquake.

Here Ai Weiwei is in a Munich hospital in September 2009 after surgery for a brain hemorrhage. He has used social media (twitter + blogging) since 2005 and throughout the 2011 documentary “Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry” you see how blogging or using twitter (@aiww | @aiwwenglish) is integral to his art practice.

Sitting in hospital here holding out his camera and giving the finger is Ai Weiwei at work as both art and activist. His extensive oeuvre as a conceptual artist inform those of us who choose to read this as art, that like Joseph Beuys and many others, intent makes this art. That the blog is hosted by the “Haus der Kunst” as one of the works in the show is the means for immediate access to the museum visitor. But there is another layer going on here. In China only officially approved blogs are allowed and twitter is often blocked by the government as are his blogs. So for a Chinese person to even engage in using twitter or any media (all publications are censored) not officially approved is an act of rebellion: hence the finger – as an aesthetic response and as act of defiance.

Still from the BBC documentary “Ai Weiwei, Without Fear or Favor” on Youtube (07:14).
About 100,000 people seemed to have disappeared without any trace or information. Over 7000 school buildings collapsed while the adjacent buildings remained intact.

When I first heard the publicity surrounding his hospitalization I found it over the top because of the focus on him and his health. Seeing the documentary gave me a context.

His continual badgering – his ongoing showing and telling is both a performative and tactical staging. The artist as activist who reveals, or the artist as human being wanting to live in a society where there is justice and freedom of expression.

The August 2009 beating in Chengdu also had artistic and political contexts. Ai Weiwei was there to provide evidence in support of Tan Zuoren on trial for “inciting subversion of state power” (More details are here) who was arrested 3 days after publicly releasing a report showing that over 5000 students had died as a result of shoddy school buildings which collapsed during the Sichuan earthquake in 2008.

Detail of a still from the 2010 BBC documentary “Ai Weiwei, Without Fear or Favor” on Youtube (08:04) showing a wall of names of the 5212 school children.
 
Ai Weiwei first visited the region in June 2008 because he wanted to use the names of the dead schoolchildren in an artwork to commemorate the tragedy and was told "The death toll is a secret" (2009 documentary "Hua Lian Ba Er" (Dirty Faces) by Ai Weiwei (Links to his videos)).
 
He found that children had been buried often without the parents being informed and the masses of school bags found in the rubble, often with their names removed, was the inspiration for his work "Remembering."
 
He used social media to ask for volunteers to help him to find out who these children were. Over 50 came to assist, knocking on doors in the towns and collecting the stories, and the names of the children who died due the collapse of school buildings. The numbers swelled to 5212.
 
Ai Weiwei posted these names on his blog on May 12th 2009 – the first birthday of their deaths. The Chinese government removed his blog two weeks later, and then a few days later blocked twitter across mainland China in anticipation of the 20th anniversary of the Tienanmen Square upheaval.
 
In another country it would be a poetic gesture: the naming of those children – but then in another country it would be another art work to start with because art exists in the contexts of its making and presentation. This commemorative act in this context became art of the unmasking.

Ai Weiwei’s own findings collected with the help of over 50 volunteers, yielded 5212 names of students and similar evidence. Then Ai Weiwei was beaten by the police during a 3 a.m. raid the night before he would appear in court and he was then locked inside the hotel. As an artist who documents he had his camera and a video camera rolling. Footage of this is in the documentary “Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry.”

His persistent documenting is a double-edged sword. His showing and telling – his own transparency – makes his both art and a human interest story to his thousands of followers, inspiring them to act as actors, participants or observers (some come to photograph). Is it less art if participants are drawn in to act? Less an artwork if it is also activism? Is it less worthy if it is also performative? His work here is art as a story told and activism as managed by an artist.

His use of social media is a way to communicate with his fellow citizens as much as a for medium for expression. And each time his access to his blog or to twitter is blocked, like many of the youth, he finds another way to communicate: all thanks to Tim Berners-Lee for keeping the web open to all and to the ubiquitous nature of the digital. However less than three percent of Chinese citizens are able to get around the “Great Firewall” (“Ai Weiwei and the Art of Protest” by Danielle Allen) which censors much of the internet in China.

“Eight months after the beating, he returned to Chengdu to file an official complaint and request an investigation. Several months later, having seen no action, he returned again to Chengdu with the strategy of filing requests for a hearing in as many government offices as possible. This series of encounters with government officials—nervous, bored, perfunctory, violent—is one of the film’s most powerful segments, and also one that Ai has broadcast via Twitter.

Still from the seven minute
TED talk: “Ai Weiwei detained” on Youtube at 5 min, 4 Apr 2011
 
In 2007 for his participation in “Documenta” in Kassel he created “Fairytale, ” the opportunity for 1001 Chinese citizens to travel to Germany, organized solely via the internet.
 
It was a journey not only to expose them to another culture and country but also to the power of social media, and their presence and experiences became part of the documenta exhibition as much as having an affect the documenta public. It was the largest project ever created for the documenta.

When one journalist who accompanied him on these visits asked him why he kept at it, he was told by Ai that “you can’t just say that the system is flawed; you have to work through the system and show it in all of its detail; that’s the only way you can ultimately make a critique.”

Will Ai Weiwei’s efforts make any difference? He is an artist whose work of petitioning is straightforwardly political, but whose use of the blogosphere to publicize that petitioning is artistic and political at once. But what exactly is the relation between voice as expression—the artist’s voice—and voice as influence: the citizen’s voice? And do social media change that relationship?” (“Ai Weiwei and the Art of Protest” by Danielle Allen)

“Dropping a Han Dynasty Urn” 1995, detail of a still from the 2010 50 minute BBC documentary “Ai Weiwei, Without Fear or Favor”
on Youtube (31:48)

Detail of a still from the 2010 50 minute BBC documentary
“Ai Weiwei, Without Fear or Favor”
on Youtube
(34:55)
“Liberty is what makes art unique” – Feng Boyi,
curator and art critic based in Beijing.


While there is a short introduction to his conceptual works, the documentary “Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry” tends to focus on him as an activist. There were aspects of his personal life shown that most would have kept out such as his out of wedlock child and the scenes with his mother who didn’t like what he was doing. You also see him as being silly and sometimes overzealous – being fallible and human. Perhaps this is a good thing since there is already an excellent documentry produced by the BBC in 2010 (you can watch it online here) which focusses on him as an artist.

And for someone immersed in the art world as I am Klayman’s human interest approach didn’t stop me from reading his blogging, videos, actions, and his silence at the end of the documentary as an ongoing work of art.

Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry, a 91 minute documentary, produced by Alison Klayman and Adam Schlesinger, toured film festivals around the world in 2012 winning a number of prizes.
 
Links: 4 minute trailer Youtube
 
Vimeo page with a trailer
and related information

 
Official website
 
The DVD will be available
from Amazon from 4 Dec 20102

 
iTunes
 
@awwneversorry

A United Expression Media presentation in association with Muse Film and Television. Produced by Alison Klayman, Adam Schlesinger. Executive producers, Karl Katz, Julie Goldman, Andrew Cohen. Directed by Alison Klayman.

With: Ai Dan, Ai Lao, Ai Weiwei, Lee Ambrozy, Danqing, Ethan Cohen, Feng Boyi, Gao Ying, Gu Changwei, He Yunchang, Hsieh Tehching, Huang Kankan. (English, Mandarin dialogue)

Still from the Youtube video, Gangnam Style, first published on 24 October 2012. 55-year-old Ai Weiwei dances ‘Gangnam Style’ by to the South Korean rapper Psy’s song

The documentary “Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry” is worth it just for the sections surrounding the destruction of his Shanghai studio while he was under house arrest and the celebratory flash mob meal of boiled lobsters by hundreds in his absence, days beforehand. The million-dollar studio was demolished because it was deemed illegal despite government approval issued a year earlier. And when thousands of individuals donated money to pay for a hefty fine issued by the government, in Kafkaesque style, he is then fined again by the government for this illegal collection of money. Similar or worse things happen to many activists but when they happen to an artist they can reworked into something enduring and universal.

The documentary begins with his 50 or more cats and while Klayman focussed on the one in a million cat who was clever enough to open the door by jumping against the handle I interpreted the overkill of domestic cats as a form of tactical aesthetics. Like giving the finger – an infantile gesture – the artist has far too many cats (too much of anything changes things), but there is another layer of meaning in the Chinese context. Maya Eva Gunst Rudolph wrote on her blog: “Deng Xiaoping’s famous declaration that “it makes no difference if a cat is black or white as long as it catches mice.” So much of Ai Weiwei’s work and life is devoted to wading through the black and white of ethical and political behavior, not to mention tangling with the often indiscriminate “mouse-catching” of the Chinese government” (Review: Ai Weiwei: Never Sorry By Maya Eva Gunst Rudolph)

Ai Weiwei has so many cats that it is satire or theatre (art at play).

Ai Weiwei’s latest video clip (released on youtube on 24 Oct 2012) of himself dancing “Gangnam Style” is another example of an art-life-act that runs in many directions. Someone who loves the South Korean rap artist PSY’s song which went viral in July 2012 will see this as poking fun at a hero. For another it is poking fun at oneself – an overweight middle-aged man who looks more like he is having fun exercising than dancing. It shows you don’t need to be beautiful to do something. For another it is poking fun at the meme: the latest trend. And artist Anish Kapoor has picked up on this as well, although he stated that he made the video in response to the Chinese government’s blocking of Ai Weiwei’s video.

“Circle of Animals/Zodiac Heads” by Ai Weiwei, shown at Somerset House, London, 12 May 2011 – 26 June 2011. Photo by Sonja van Kerkhoff, which may be freely used if credited.

“Circle of Animals/Zodiac Heads” by Ai Weiwei, shown at Somerset House, London, 12 May 2011 – 26 June 2011. Photo by Sonja van Kerkhoff (Creative Commons).
Free use if credited.
Detail of one of 12 statues which are a recreation of those made for the European-style Yuanmingyuan gardens, the old Summer Palace in Beijing which was destroyed by British and French troops 150 years ago during the Second Opium War. These statues were designed in the 18th century by two European Jesuits serving in the court of the Qing dynasty Emperor Qianlong. In re-interpreting these objects on an oversized scale, Ai Weiwei focuses attention on themes around looting, repatriation, the ‘fake’ and the copy in relation to the original or antique, culture and tradition. See: somersethouse.org.uk www.zodiacheads.com or


For the art world it pokes fun at the art of refinement or perhaps the slickly-made music video – his video is like a home movie where he and his studio assistants walk outside his house to perform for the camera which wobbles here and there, while waving dried leaves and handcuffs around. The shots of horses in stables appear suddenly and are gone again as if they were a mistake someone forgot to remove before the final cut.
Ai Weiwei employs artisans of the highest level when he wants to and his work is characterized by its attention to detail so anyone in the art world knows that the video “style” is a deliberate gesture.

For a Chinese viewer the horses in the stalls also poke fun at censorship. The Mandarin phrase ‘cào ni ma’ (grass mud horse) a mythical creature also means ‘fuck your mother’ and since 2009 has been widely used as word play in response to the censorship on the use of words on the internet in China (the characters used to write its name are benign and so remained undetected by the digital filters).

Words can be censored but meaning and thinking are as uncontrollable as a herd of cats. So it makes sense that when freedom of speech is controlled words have to be wordplay and gestures thrust the forbidden meanings into the public space.

ISEA in Bzyantium

17Jan

“Caught in that sensual music all neglect
Monuments of unaging intellect.” 1

One view of the exhibition, "UNTITLED-second-nature (Te Kore-Rongo-Hungaora)". "Te Taiao Māori" (The Maori World/Environment) text on wall, 2011 by Te Huirangi Waikerepuru (Tribal affiliations: Taranaki, Whānui, Nga Puhi, Taitokerau), flanked by four speakers which are the soundpiece, "Te Kore Street of Breaths" by Sophie Jerram and Dugal McKinnon. On the left is "Mauri Wai Mauri Ora" (Water Energy, Life Energy), Taranaki volcanic stone + acrylic by Jo Tito (Tribal affiliations: Taranaki, Ngāti Pikiao, Tūhourangi-Ngāti Wāhiao). On the floor are one of the star shaped "Photo Astronomy," telescope photographs by Paul Moss.

New Zealand had a major presence at the 2011 InterSociety for Electronic Arts event with the exhibition, “Uncontainable-second-nature (Te Kore-Rongo-Hungaora).” At ISEA it contributed to expanding an ongoing dialogue of electronic artistic practice in an international context. Lanfranco Aceti, director of ISEA Istanbul created an ideal forum for the experience of electronic art by locating 5 of the 8 exhibitions within the centrally located Istanbul Municipal Gallery (Taksim Cumhuriyet Sanat Galerisi).

Previously the annual ISEA events have tended to focus on the two week conference, with exhibited work generally being displayed rather than presented within a conceptual framework (link to the curational concept for ISEA2011). However Aceti also went beyond the confines of the ISEA event in having these ISEA Istanbul exhibitions accepted as an official part of the concurrent Istanbul Biennial

Poster outside the Istanbul Municipal Gallery (Taksim Cumhuriyet Sanat Galerisi), Taksim Square, Istanbul.

It is one thing that this ISEA event was connected with such an international event in the art world but there were also conceptual connections on a number of levels made between the two exhibitions. Aceti used the title “UNCONTAINABLE” as an umbrella term for the independently curated shows, of which the New Zealand-Aotearoa show was part, while the Istanbul Biennial used the umbrella term “UNTITLED” – a reference to the American-Cuban artist, Felix Gonzalez-Torres whose use of this term referred among other things, to the influences of cultural hegemony in naming and categorizing.
While the Istanbul Biennial took a more literal route, also in the way each of the mini-shows were named after a particular work by Gonzalez-Torres, Aceti’s title “UNCONTAINABLE” touches on the ‘in-tangible’ inviting us to ask questions about what is contained to begin with, or how does electronic media ‘contain’ or ‘colonize’ in today’s world. The subtitles for each of the independently curated shows expanded this notion of ‘the ability or inability to contain’ in an organic manner. The New Zealand show subtitled “second-nature” at face value seems to be a reference to othering or alternative nature and in some ways it was, if one’s only point of reference are western cultural values.
Just as Aceti responded to the theme “UNTITLED” and expanded on this by use of the word “UNCONTAINABLE,” the New Zealand curator Ian Clothier’s use of the term ‘second nature’ does likewise as did a number of the works in the show.

"Te Taiao Māori", text on wall, 2011 by Te Huirangi Waikerepuru (Tribal affiliations: Taranaki, Whānui, Nga Puhi, Taitokerau), flanked by four speakers which are the soundpiece, "Te Kore Street of Breaths" by Sophie Jerram and Dugal McKinnon. On the left is "Mauri Wai Mauri Ora" (Water Energy, Life Energy), Taranaki volcanic stone + acrylic by Jo Tito (Tribal affiliations: Taranaki, Ngāti Pikiao, Tūhourangi-Ngāti Wāhiao).

As you entered the space of curved arches and walls, you encountered a wall of 6 metres of text arranged similiar to a family tree, of words in Maori with English translations. Like a family tree there was an ancestor above branches. This work, “Te Taiao Maori” (The Maori Environment/World) by Huirangi Waikerepuru is a cosmology of what we can feel, hear and taste, a ‘second-nature’ where potentiality is the common ancestor and elements such as life, water, time, interaction, or matter are the offspring.

The wall of text acknowledging the natural world in the context of an international electronic arts show made an immediate impact on anyone there. While one could make analogies with even how programmers programme in levels, modules or processes -a blueprint for the electronic- what Waikerepuru was illustrating was another type of blueprint that functioned like a support or spine for the body of the whole show rather than as a container or means for categorization. Although the text appeared to be like hierarchy, in fact it was an arrangement of three systems beneath each other and the words he used in turn raised questions such as the role of the natural world with the digital.

From this text flowed each of the artworks by the other artists.

"Mauri Wai Mauri Ora," Taranaki stone, acrylic + text by Jo Tito.

On the left side sat a volcanic stone (a kohatu or mauri, a special stone) bearing a painted motif reminescent of a wave by Jo Tito accompanied by a text connecting water to the flow of water within each of us.

"Mauri Wai Mauri Ora", Taranaki stone, acrylic + text by Jo Tito.

On either side there were speakers for the soundpiece “Te Kore Street of Breaths” by Sophie Jerram and Dugal McKinnon – a continuous audible starting and stopping of breath. Across from the text was Lisa Reihana’s video projection, "Whanaunga" (Relative) with a soundscape by James Pinker, featuring Maui (who brought a number of skills to the world of humanity such as the gift of fire) in the heavens and in water.

"Whanaunga" (Relative), 2011 digital video by Lisa Reihana (tribal affiliations: Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Hine and Ngāi Tu) and sound by James Pinker. In the background is a detail of "Kāinga a roto," (Home Within) a five screen digital video installation by Sonja van Kerkhoff, Sen McGlinn and Toroa Pohatu.

Reihana’s imagery oscillates between patterns, abstractions and a larger than life, Maui, a figure from the mists of time, as a surfer on the water. The title and surfing associations emphasize the present continuous. The soundscape (by James Pinker) – a rich orchestration of nuances and subtleties – could be read as an interpretation of a nature of continual presence akin to Waikerepuru’s use of the word “Papa-tu-a-nuku” (Revolving Earth) which emphasizes both the everyday, and natural and cultural history in one turn. Julian Oliver’s work “psworld” on the other hand takes a thimble of ‘ordinary’ water to enlarge on the extraordinary. Here a microscope not only facilitates the input for a computer, but nature controls the lifecycle of the computer. For this rendition of his work (see an earlier rendition), the microscope is focussed on protozoa in water which were projected on the wall. Their spontaneous and active movement determined the lifecycle of the (Linux) operating system which ran the computer. When there was too much variation in the movement of the organisms, the programme shut down the computer only to start it up again in order to repeat the process until nature closed it down again. Oliver has used the ‘ps’ function (used on UNIX-like operating systems as a way of showing in coded text what is happening on the computer as a means of testing its own system) to reveal this dependency between one system (the computer) and another (the natural world). In “psworld” coded text appear on the screen over the projection of the protoza informing us of the activity of the protoza as perceived by the computer. It is an exposed computer: vulnerable and dependent on a biological world in flow.
 
A scattering of star shaped photographs taken with a telescope by Paul Moss were arranged between all of the works mentioned above.

Left to Right: Detail of "Kāinga a roto" (Home Within), a five screen digital video installation inside a curved construction by Sonja van Kerkhoff, Sen McGlinn + Toroa Pohatu; "One man is an island," (obscured) a 6 minute and 40 second high definition video loop by Rachael Rakena (Tribal affiliations: Ngāi Tahu, Ngā Puhi); Text by the curator, Ian Clothier; "Computational Visualization of the Electromagnetic Sensory World of Sharks," 3-d modelling and animation, 2008, by Mike Paulin, and part of "Energy comes from the sun," hardware, software and digital display + 9 waterproof camera cases with texts with texts and selected elements from specific locations along the Whanganui river by Julian Priest.

In the adjacent vaulted space, Mike Paulin’s video was a modelling of the electromagnetic sensory world of the dogfish shark (Squalus acanthias). As a zoologist his approach was empirical while the adjacent video, “One man is an island” by Rachael Rakena could be read as a poetic connection with Waikerekpuru’s cosmology.

"One man is an island,", 2009, HD Video, 6 minutes, 40 seconds, by Rachael Rakena.

The man stands comfortably in a transmuted sea or lake and seems so at home here that he eats a fruit he has picked from its surface, taking no notice of his reflection on the same surface. Rakena’s simple yet loaded imagery highlights the complex interactions between the natural world and human nature. The imaginary simultaneously estranges and makes connections. The man is both isolated – not in communion with his world, and yet also embedded, embraced and grounded. This duality also references Maori concepts of tapu and noa, of the energized, vulnerable yet unpredictable powers of nature as well as ways a person can attain balance or place within the ‘natural’ environment.

"Energy comes from the sun," hardware, software and digital display + 9 waterproof camera cases with texts with texts and selected elements from specific locations along the Whanganui river by Julian Priest. Beyond is "Tele_Trust," 2009/10, by Karen Lancel + Hermen Maat (The Netherlands, http://www.lancelmaat.nl), in the "UNCONTAINABLE & Untitled" (http://isea2011.sabanciuniv.edu/other-event/uncontainable-untitled) exhibition curated by Lanfranco Aceti + Özden Şahin. On the left is a detail of "Kāinga a roto" (Home Within), a five screen digital video installation inside a curved construction by Sonja van Kerkhoff, Sen McGlinn and Toroa Pohatu.


"Information comes from the sun" by Julian Priest consists of two parts: a circular plinth topped by nine transparent camera containers accompanied by a text placed on the plinth below each camera, and a visualization of solar power.

"Energy comes from the sun" by Julian Priest in front of "Kāinga a roto (Home Within) by Sonja van Kerkhoff, Sen McGlinn and Toroa Pohatu.

Each of the nine texts names a location, followed by a reference to an aspect of Maori cosmology not unlike the words used in Waikerepuru’s wall of text. However Priest connects each concept, such as water (labelled “The Caressing Waters”) not only to a locality or materiality (for example, this water comes from Whitianga marae and a spring which only women may use) but also to a specific experience or description which relates to the object contained within the camera container.

Detail of "Energy comes from the sun" by Julian Priest.


Waikerepuru’s words give equal weight to the conceptual and the phenomenological, whereas Priest’s approach seems to be about diverse systems of ‘show and tell’ which seemed to be lost on most of the public. This was a work that needed some form of explanation for a public unfamiliar with New Zealand. A statement that all these locations were along the same river (The Whanganui River) would then help people to see the connections between location, forms of explanation (some texts were poetic, some encyclopedic) and the objects contained within. It was also hard to see the connection between the visualization of solar power in the form of changing orange zeros and the camera containers. The display was intended to correlate with the intensity of the sun’s energy in real-time. Perhaps the disparities, the contrasts and differences were the intent of the work. The title relates to the display of orange zeros while the various elements inside the cameras it could be argued, are the result of life, made possible by our sun.

However the aspect of nature which seems to dominate in this exhibition is that of water. In the final work in the show, “Kāinga a roto” (Home Within),” a five screen digital video installation inside a curved construction by Sonja van Kerkhoff, Sen McGlinn + Toroa Pohatu, videos and soundscapes present rivers, the sea, waterfalls and rain as a recurring motif. And water flows throughout the show either via words, elements it has shaped (such as the sea worn stone) or visually in the various videos. Perhaps what is ‘second nature’ is not so much wai-rua, literally the second current, but that materiality (first nature) is more fluid than one might imagine.


The quotation and reference in the title comes from the poem,
Sailing To Byzantium by W.B. Yeats


Links:
Intercreate.org, which lists all artists and some images.
The ISEA webpage for this exhibition

A Leiden Last Judgement – 2011

24May

Contemporary artworks by 12 Leiden artists: Maurice Braspenning – Hans de Bruijn – Casper Faassen – Gijs Donker – Hanneke Francken – Marjolein van Haasteren – Allart Lakke – Johan Scherft – Thomas Raat – Maayke Schuitema – Guido Winkler – Izaak Zwartjes
This life-size copy of van Leyden’s 1526 triptych onto canvas (the original is around the corner on display in the Lakenhal until June) by Allan Lakke (www.lakke.com) was wedged behind the stairwell, as if it didn’t quite fit. Here Lakke has ‘copied’ frame and painting as one unit. This reproduction, just like a reproduction a ‘famous painting’ reproduction – flat and photographic – only that this is a life-size copy set under a ceiling that is too low and a stairwell that is in the way, makes it not so much a comment on reproduction as a comment on context. Where does one fit a triptych about the “last judgement” in today’s world? Lakke’s other works in the show, models of tryptychs with blank panels seem in contrast more about the history of reproduction.

Casper Faassen’s triptych, of the same dimensions, omits the figuration evident in Lakke’s. The central panel of frosted glass is illumined by a spot and the hinged two side panels are transparent sheets of glass. Is there nothing to say? Has it all been said? Has the story been removed or is it replaced with a new story? In any case what we are left with in Faassen’s work is an aesthetic of form bordering between high art and the domestic.

Casper Faassens and Allan Lakke are the initiators of this exhibition. They selected the artists, negotiated the location, and found sponsorship.

Some artists in the show responded to the themes of life and death, heaven and hell, or judgement such as Maayke Schuitema’s “Magna Mater”. Here a pregnant woman has replaced the crucifix and is flanked by scenes of women who are literally and symbollically juggling symbols of birth and death. Each woman’s womb bears either an symbol for life or death.
Anyone familiar with contemporarty art can’t help but think of Francis Bacon‘s 1953 iconic screaming pope, and Maurice Braspenning’s painting, “Pope” hold its ground in this context. Braspenning’s pope (the current pope, Benedictus XVI) is more insideous. The scene seems serene. Braspenning’s craftmanship makes the looking enjoyable. However sooner or later you start to see the inconsistences.
The smile is like too much makeup, and then the faint chalklines, make the decorativeness seem like a facade. And are those white circles puncture holes or signs of decay? Of ruptures in the structure? Is the pope laughing at himself or at an imaginary audience, at God? at the world today? Or is he communicating with a world we are missing? A spirituality we can’t see?
Braspenning’s work is complex and he has kept the vocabulary simple. The title is just “Pope”, the profile is delicate, yet not fussy.
But if you take time, each detail is loaded with messages about the appearances of things. Is the cross in the Pope’s eye a blindspot or a source of guidance? Or is it a cross hair target found in mechanical devices, so that the Pope is a “deus ex machina” – directed from where? from above or from within?
Is the black on the left just a large glossy black oval. A mirror? A void – a symbol for what is missing or a bubble about to burst? Or just a reminder that a surface is just a surface? A reminder of our own materiality.
Braspenning leaves the judgement up to us.

Johan Scherft‘s contribution to the show were a number of finely painted vignettes, which border on outsider art. For the painting, “De Boom van de kennis van goed en kwaad (The tree of good and evil)” a magnifying glass was supplied so you can view the tiny creatures living idyllically in the tree in a Romantic garden before there was any judgement.

Marjolein van Haasteren has placed 3 small glossy dark photographs of urban scapes and given these titles such as “Underworld” or “Gate” – the images are from our world, the here and now. Next to these is a large abstracted painting titled “Styx” and above this is a 5th work, a soundscape of subtle rumbling abstract sounds made with Martijn Groen. The diverse media and approach create an almost installation-like experience on themes related to definitions of borders and locations. For example the ‘gate’ could refer to an entrance inside the image presented on the surface of the form underneath the layers of laquer, or to within the depth of the form itself or to the idea of civilisation. Or perhaps the gate is even an escape from the locations presented by the imagery? Likewise with the painting: forms seem to defy gavity and above could be under where the Styx serves as a metaphor for being in a state of transistion.

Finally Guido Winkler has made a free standing triptych which you can interact with.
It was fabulous.

All three panels could be moved in a variety of ways.

You could make your own abstact combination or you could see the grey shades as symbollic for shadows or you could make real shadows by positioning the panels.

Interacting with this work physically, and moving around the work to view it from various locations, made me think this was a brilliant interpretation on the theme of the show. Judgment was doing -is active and mutable. And in today’s contemporary intellectual world a more ethereal experience. We live in worlds with shades of grey – no longer is this a world where there is a clear right or wrong way of leading one’s life – judgement is in how we lead our lives and our motivation lies in the shades of grey of whatever we call ‘doing good’ than in a medival black and white fear of damnation. How we are judged is in the here and now and in small daily acts, such as whether I moved that panel this way or that way. And finally a judgement of form or aesthetics created by each person is then left for the next visitor to encounter and to change.

‘t Laatste Oordeel -12 actuele interpretaties was on show at the Scheltema Contemporary Arts Centre, Leiden, 26 March – 1 May 2011, www.lovl.nl

Game and consequence? 2011

23Apr

Dutch journalist and game researcher, David Nieborg is referring to a recent school shooting in the Netherlands and a newspaper heading which connected the shooting to the influence of video games.
The discussion that followed this ended up with some insisting that ‘serious games‘ were very different to ‘video games’ and that that this is the distinction that needs to be made for the public while the other view was that ‘serious games’ should be promoted as being like all games, whether computer or not and the distinction, if there is any, is in the context and type of interaction. I agree with the second view and Joost Raessen’s presentation elaborated on this. David’s reason for mentioning this was to show how important it is for academics to use the media rather than having the media use them. If there had been statements made at the time it would be a way for academics to ‘play’ and not be ‘played’ by the media.

The expert meeting I attended on April 15th: “Play or be played” hosted at the Delft University and co-organized by the STT Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends + GATE Game Research for Training and Entertainment, began with four researchers giving presentations on “The Future of Serious Gaming” (a term for games developed with a purpose – such as to educate, inform or enlighten)
Moderated by Igor Mayer, associate professor of Public Management and Gaming in the faculty of Technology, Policy and Management (TPM) at Delft University of Technology, the speakers were:
Maurits Kreijveld, project manager Foresight Study Wisdom of the Crowd, STT Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends
Maurits Kreijveld presents.

David B. Nieborg, game researcher and journalist; PhD-student with the Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis, University of Amsterdam

Joost Raessens, professor of Media Theory, Utrecht University (www.gamesandplay.nl)
and
Remco Veltkamp, professor in the Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University and director of GATE: Game research for training and entertainment

Joost Raessen‘s presentation focussed on a discussion of ‘context’ and in particular on Lakoff‘s theory of frames (link to the article, Frame Semantics which summarizes various aspects of this) and theories of family ( “us/them” framing) in connection with his own research on the various implications of serious games and video war games and in particular in connection with insights gleaned from working with Jolle Demmers (Assistant Professor and co-founder of the Centre for Conflict Studies, Utrecht University.) In particular he noted that in terms of ‘conflict’ and game strategy, games such as Dafur is Dying (where the goal is to learn about the situation and actions revolve around the perspectives of the refugee) and a typical war video game such as Call of Duty have a lot in common because both games support a ‘new wars’ frame. That is “us” vs “them” perspectives, and in this sense they share a similar ‘frame’, a similiar ideology in support of a rhetoric of conflict.

In passing, Joost Raessens mentioned a number of games and organizations involved in developing games. I’ll note some of these here:

The book, Ludoliteracy, Defining, Understanding, and Supporting Games Education by José Zagal

Books Joost Raessens has contributed to: Digital Material Tracing New Media in Everyday Life and Technology (2009)
Serious Games, Mechanisms and effects (2009)

Games for Change: who host “the Sundance of Video Games”, the Games for Change Annual Festival held in NYC in June as well as providing support, networking, and development.

Food Force: a World Food Programme (WFP) video game aimed at teaching children about the logistical challenges of delivering food aid during a major humanitarian crisis, it is set on a fictitious island called Sheylan riven by drought and war. Food Force invites children to complete six virtual missions that reflect real-life obstacles faced by WFP in its emergency responses both to the tsunami and other hunger crises around the world.

Dafur is Dying a viral video game for change providing a window into the experience of the 2.5 million refugees in the Darfur region of Sudan. Players must keep their refugee camp functioning in the face of possible attack by Janjaweed militias. Players can also learn more about the genocide in Darfur.

Casper Harteveld’s theories on game design + Triadic Game Design

Re-mission video game for teens and young adults with cancer.

And here is a link to a related article (in Dutch: gaming for rice and beans) “Gamen voor rijst en bonen” which I came across while writing this blog.

Link to video clips of the presentations

Quake & SCAPE – Christchurch 2011

13Apr

The number sequence 043504092010 (the hour, minute (04:35), day, month and year of the 4 September 2010 earthquake) first changed the landscape of Christchurch and caused the postponement of the Public Sculpture biennial, SCAPE (photos of some public art projects are here).
This t-shirt design was produced just before the major aftershock on February 22nd by SCAPE artist participant Anton Parsons for the opening of the 6th SCAPE Christchurch Biennial which was planned for March 2010. It was then canceled and now SCAPE is selling this t-shirt as a recovery fund venture.

"Nucleus" by Phil Price (2006)
Photographer: Dean MacKenzie Commissioned for SCAPE 2006 © SCAPE Christchurch Biennial


Some of the sculptures completed before the February aftershock are still standing. And I was amazed, when I saw footage of the disaster back in February to see one of my favourite inner city sculptures (the four inner parts move constantly like a wind chime, see this YouTube clip) was still standing and operating surrounded by rubble and collapsed buildings, a symbol not only of survival but of the magic of art.

And on that note I was swept off my feet by this song written by Ryan Fisherman, a Christchurch resident about his city and the quake. The undertone of calm is unnerving and moving, much like the image of the gentle slow movements of the red kinetic sculpture while all around the land shakes and shudders.


Country quake (song + video) by Ryan Fisherman
ryanfisherman.bandcamp.com